Lightning Network hit ATH capacity while Bitcoin L2 TVL sits at just 0.46% of supply. Here's what's really happening in the Bitcoin infrastructure race.
Kai Nakamoto
Emerging Tech Analyst
The Bitcoin Layer 2 narrative is fracturing. While the broader "BTCFi" market struggles to find its footing, specific protocols are quietly building the infrastructure that will define Bitcoin's next decade. Lightning is winning enterprise adoption. Stacks is betting on smart contracts. RSK is the veteran nobody talks about.
Here's what's actually happening, and what it means for Bitcoin's evolution as an application platform.
Bitcoin DeFi TVL now sits at $7.1 billion, representing just 0.46% of all Bitcoin in circulation. The number looks dismal compared to Ethereum's $74 billion DeFi ecosystem. Only 91,332 BTC are locked across all Bitcoin Layer 2 solutions.
But here's what the headline numbers miss: the BTC-denominated decline masks USD growth. While Bitcoin Layer 2 TVL dropped roughly 10% in BTC terms (from 101,721 BTC), the dollar value of BTCFi actually grew 41% year-over-year thanks to Bitcoin's price appreciation.
The 2024 Bitcoin Layer 2 boom was driven by Ordinals speculation and airdrop farming. That capital was never truly "locked," it was parked temporarily. When yields dried up, speculative capital left. What remains is stickier, institutional-grade capital, primarily in restaking protocols like Babylon ($4.95B TVL) and Lombard ($1B TVL).
The smart money isn't chasing yields. It's building Bitcoin infrastructure for the long term.
Lightning Network just hit record capacity at 5,637 BTC (approximately $490 million at current prices). This matters more than any TVL metric.
Lightning Network capacity reached an all-time high of 5,637 BTC in late 2025, surpassing the previous peak of 5,606 BTC set in March 2023. This Bitcoin Layer 2 milestone signals growing enterprise adoption.
| Metric | Value | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| Network Capacity | 5,637 BTC (~$490M) | All-time high |
| Active Nodes | 14,940 | Down 28% from peak |
| Payment Channels | 48,678 | Stable |
| Volume Growth | 266% YoY | Strong |
| Median Fee Rate | 0.0029% | 1,000x cheaper than cards |
The node count decline from 20,700 (early 2022) to 14,940 looks bad until you understand what happened: hobbyist nodes exited while enterprise infrastructure scaled up. Binance, OKX, and institutional custodians now run the majority of capacity.
Square is rolling out Lightning integration to 4 million merchants through 2026. Tether led an $8 million investment in Speed, a Lightning-based stablecoin payments platform. These aren't experiments. They're production deployments.
The payment success rate now exceeds 99% in controlled deployments. Fees sit at 0.0029%, compared to 2-3.5% for credit card processing. For merchants, the math is simple.
Lightning is becoming the settlement layer for Bitcoin payments. That's a different game than DeFi.
Stacks is taking a different approach entirely. Instead of competing on payments, it's betting that Bitcoin needs smart contracts.
The TVL-price divergence tells the story. Network activity is growing (11% weekly TVL increase from Circle's USDCx integration), but the token hasn't followed. This suggests the market is skeptical about Stacks' ability to capture value from its ecosystem growth.
The Nakamoto upgrade brought true Bitcoin finality to Stacks. Blocks now settle with the same security guarantees as Bitcoin itself. Combined with sBTC (a Bitcoin-backed asset that hit its 5,000 BTC bridge cap shortly after launch), Stacks now has the technical foundation for serious Bitcoin DeFi ecosystem development. This positions Stacks as a leading Bitcoin smart contracts platform.
The Q1 2026 roadmap includes USDC integration, a Tier 1 stablecoin that would make Stacks the first Bitcoin L2 with canonical stablecoin support.
Stacks faces the same problem every Bitcoin Layer 2 confronts: why would users choose Bitcoin smart contracts over Ethereum L2s?
The scale difference is stark. Ethereum Layer 2 solutions like Arbitrum and Base command billions in TVL compared to Stacks' $130 million. The gap isn't just about features. It's about network effects, liquidity, and the developers who build where users already are.
Stacks' counter-argument: Bitcoin security matters more than Ethereum liquidity for certain use cases. For Bitcoin-native DeFi, the security guarantees of settling on Bitcoin may outweigh Ethereum's liquidity advantages. Time will tell if that thesis holds.
RSK launched in 2018. It has maintained 100% uptime since then. It has over 150 ecosystem partners. Almost nobody talks about it.
This is partly RSK's fault (the marketing has been minimal) and partly the market's fault (new narratives always capture more attention than working infrastructure).
RSK uses merge-mining with Bitcoin, meaning Bitcoin miners can secure RSK without additional hardware. This gives RSK security comparable to Bitcoin itself.
RSK brings EVM compatibility to Bitcoin. Developers can deploy Ethereum smart contracts on a Bitcoin-secured sidechain. The RIF token powers the infrastructure layer, enabling Bitcoin smart contracts with familiar Solidity tooling.
For enterprises that want Ethereum-style programmability with Bitcoin-grade security, RSK makes sense as a Bitcoin Layer 2 solution. The problem is that this use case requires explaining. Lightning and Stacks have simpler narratives: "fast payments" and "Bitcoin DeFi."
RSK's best path forward is probably not consumer adoption. It's becoming the enterprise infrastructure layer for Bitcoin-secured smart contracts, similar to how private Ethereum chains serve financial institutions. This positions RSK as the Bitcoin infrastructure play for institutional use cases.
The CLARITY Act's expected passage in 2026 would define SEC and CFTC jurisdiction over crypto assets, with the CFTC gaining an expanded role. This matters specifically for Bitcoin Layer 2 infrastructure.
Bitcoin itself is already classified as a commodity. L2 solutions that extend Bitcoin's functionality could inherit that clarity, avoiding the regulatory uncertainty that plagues many Ethereum-based protocols.
Goldman Sachs' 2026 outlook specifically cited regulatory clarity as the catalyst for institutional adoption of Bitcoin infrastructure. The bipartisan market structure legislation expected this year would cement blockchain-based finance in U.S. capital markets.
Let's be direct about the trade-offs.
The Bitcoin Layer 2 race isn't about which protocol "wins." It's about Bitcoin becoming more than just digital gold.
Lightning handles payments. Stacks handles smart contracts. RSK handles enterprise programmability. Babylon and Lombard handle restaking. Each serves a different purpose.
The modest TVL decline in BTC terms was a purge of speculative capital. What's building now is Bitcoin infrastructure, the kind that takes years to deploy but decades to replace.
Note: This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Bitcoin's evolution from digital gold to application platform is happening through these Layer 2 solutions. It's just happening more slowly, and more deliberately, than the hype cycles suggested. The protocols building Bitcoin infrastructure through this quiet period will likely define Bitcoin's next decade.
Market analysis and actionable insights. No spam, ever.
