Skip to main content
Back to Research
EducationFree

Understanding the STRICT Score: How We Rank Cryptocurrencies

Learn how Coira's proprietary STRICT scoring system evaluates cryptocurrencies based on fundamental metrics, not hype.

Reviewed by Kamyar Taher, Editor-in-Chief
Understanding the STRICT Score: How We Rank Cryptocurrencies

At Coira, we believe in transparent, data-driven analysis. Our STRICT Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates cryptocurrencies based on fundamental factors, not social media hype or price momentum.

What Does STRICT Stand For?

STRICT is an acronym representing six fundamental dimensions we evaluate for every cryptocurrency:

🔋

S - Sustainability

Long-term viability of the project, including treasury runway, revenue model, and partnerships

🔍

T - Transparency

Team credibility, governance quality, audits, and communication standards

📊

R - Revenue

Actual protocol revenue, fees, and sustainable income (null for store-of-value assets)

💡

I - Innovation

Technical advancement, development activity, and competitive moat

👥

C - Community

Developer activity, user adoption, DAU metrics, and ecosystem growth

💰

T - Tokenomics

Token distribution, supply mechanics, inflation schedule, and utility

How We Calculate Scores

Each component is scored independently on a scale of 0-100:

ComponentScaleWhat We Measure
Sustainability0-100Treasury health, runway, battle-tested code
Transparency0-100Team visibility, governance, communication
Revenue0-100Protocol fees, business model viability
Innovation0-100Technology uniqueness, dev activity
Community0-100DAU, ecosystem growth, adoption
Tokenomics0-100Supply mechanics, utility, distribution

The overall STRICT score is a weighted average of these components, reflecting our assessment of long-term project health.

💡Pro Tip

Revenue can be null for store-of-value assets like Bitcoin, as they are not designed to generate protocol revenue. In these cases, other factors carry more weight in the overall assessment.

Score Tiers Explained

95-100
Legendary
85-94
Gold
70-84
Silver
50-69
Bronze
0-49
Standard
  • Legendary (95-100): Elite-tier fundamentals, exceptional across all dimensions
  • Gold (85-94): Strong fundamentals with high conviction and minimal concerns
  • Silver (70-84): Solid project with good fundamentals and some areas to watch
  • Bronze (50-69): Moderate quality, notable risks or unproven metrics
  • Standard (0-49): High risk, significant concerns in multiple dimensions

Example Score Breakdown

Here's how a top-rated project like Aave might score:

Score Breakdown

Sustainability
88
Transparency
90
Revenue
85
Innovation
82
Community
87
Tokenomics
80

Why Fundamentals Matter

"In the short run, the market is a voting machine. In the long run, it's a weighing machine." - Benjamin Graham

Price can be manipulated short-term, but fundamentals determine long-term value. Projects with real revenue, active development, and sustainable tokenomics tend to outperform over time.

High STRICT Score Projects

Proven revenue models, active teams, strong governance, multiple income streams, battle-tested code

Low STRICT Score Projects

No revenue, anonymous teams, centralized control, unlimited inflation, unaudited contracts

Start Your Analysis

📈Ready to dive in?

Explore our rankings to see how your favorite cryptocurrencies score. Make informed decisions based on data, not hype.

View the Rankings →

Weekly Crypto Insights

Market analysis and actionable insights. No spam, ever.