Metodologi STRICT
Kerangka komprehensif untuk mengevaluasi proyek cryptocurrency di enam dimensi kritis
Apa itu STRICT?
STRICT adalah kerangka kerja eksklusif kami untuk mengevaluasi proyek cryptocurrency. STRICT adalah singkatan dari Sustainability (Keberlanjutan), Transparency (Transparansi), Revenue (Pendapatan), Innovation (Inovasi), Community (Komunitas), dan Tokenomics. Setiap pilar mewakili aspek fundamental dari kesehatan dan potensi proyek crypto.
Berbeda dengan sistem penilaian sederhana yang hanya mengandalkan hype atau kapitalisasi pasar, STRICT memberikan analisis multi-dimensi yang mempertimbangkan metrik kuantitatif dan faktor kualitatif. Setiap proyek crypto menerima skor dari 0 hingga 100 pada setiap pilar, dengan skor keseluruhan tertimbang.
Metodologi ini dikembangkan melalui analisis ratusan proyek crypto di berbagai siklus pasar. Ini membantu investor membedakan antara proyek berkelanjutan dengan fundamental nyata dan aset spekulatif yang didorong murni oleh narasi.
Enam Pilar STRICT
Keberlanjutan
Kelangsungan jangka panjang dan kesehatan finansial proyek
Faktor Utama
Transparansi
Keterbukaan dan akuntabilitas dalam tim, tata kelola, dan operasi
Faktor Utama
Pendapatan
Generasi pendapatan protokol dan viabilitas model bisnis
Faktor Utama
Inovasi
Keunikan teknologi dan aktivitas pengembangan
Faktor Utama
Komunitas
Adopsi pengguna, pertumbuhan ekosistem, dan efek jaringan
Faktor Utama
Tokenomik
Mekanika suplai token, utilitas, dan keadilan distribusi
Faktor Utama
Cara Kami Menghitung Skor
Proses penilaian kami menggabungkan analisis data kuantitatif dengan penilaian ahli kualitatif, diverifikasi melalui beberapa agen AI dan direferensi silang dengan sumber otoritatif.
Pengumpulan Data
Kami mengumpulkan data dari blockchain explorer, GitHub, dokumentasi resmi, CoinGecko, dan platform analitik on-chain. Semua sumber data diverifikasi keakuratannya.
Analisis Multi-Agen
Enam agen AI khusus menganalisis berbagai aspek proyek secara paralel. Setiap agen fokus pada metrik spesifik dalam domain keahliannya.
Validasi & Verifikasi
Tujuh agen validasi memeriksa ulang semua titik data, memverifikasi klaim terhadap sumber otoritatif, memeriksa halusinasi, dan menilai kualitas konten.
Penilaian Tertimbang
Skor komponen ditimbang berdasarkan jenis aset dan sektor. Skor STRICT keseluruhan mewakili pandangan seimbang tentang kesehatan dan potensi proyek.
Scoring reference
Every number in this section is read from the scoring engine's constants registry when the page renders. It is not a transcription, so the published methodology cannot drift from the code that produces the scores.
The formula
cᵢ = published pillar score, 0–10 (null when we have no basis to score it)
wᵢ = weight of pillar i in the coin's sector profile; Σ wᵢ = 1
score = round( Σ round(10 · cᵢ) · wᵢ / Σ wᵢ ) over observed pillars onlyEach coin dataset publishes the six pillar scores on a 0–10 scale. The engine scales them to 0–100, takes the sector-weighted mean, and rounds to an integer. A pillar with no published value is excluded from the weighted sum and from the denominator, so the headline score is always the mean of the pillars that were actually scored — never a silent zero.
Pillar weights by sector profile
A Store-of-Value asset and a lending protocol are not judged on the same axes. Every sector resolves to one of nine weight profiles; the weights inside a profile sum to 1. A weight of 0% means the pillar is deliberately not part of that sector's score.
| Profile | Keberlanjutan | Transparansi | Pendapatan | Inovasi | Komunitas | Tokenomik |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| balanced | 22% | 17% | 16% | 18% | 13% | 14% |
| monetary | 26% | 12% | 0% | 12% | 24% | 26% |
| stableAsset | 28% | 24% | 8% | 8% | 12% | 20% |
| derivative | 24% | 20% | 8% | 12% | 12% | 24% |
| financialProtocol | 20% | 16% | 24% | 16% | 10% | 14% |
| networkProtocol | 20% | 14% | 10% | 24% | 18% | 14% |
| technicalInfra | 18% | 14% | 14% | 26% | 14% | 14% |
| adoptionLed | 16% | 12% | 8% | 14% | 26% | 24% |
| paymentsRwa | 24% | 20% | 16% | 12% | 12% | 16% |
Which sectors use which profile
Pillars we do not score
Two cases are structural rather than missing data, and the engine records them explicitly: Store of Value → revenue; Meme → revenue. A store-of-value asset has no protocol revenue to score, so scoring it as 0 would be a fabrication.
Everywhere else, a null pillar means we found no defensible basis for a number. In the published score that pillar is dropped, not imputed — which is a real limitation worth stating plainly: a coin scored on four pillars is not penalised for the two we could not assess. Read the pillar bars on a coin page, not only the headline.
The engine also implements a stricter policy that is not what the published score uses: a fixed denominator over all applicable pillars, a missing pillar imputed at the sector mean minus 0.75 (0–10 scale), a missing pillar whose sector weight is 20% or more imputed at max(mean − 2 × 0.75, 2) and flagged as a critical gap, and a low-coverage flag whenever observed weight falls below 70% of applicable weight.
Version and reproducibility
constantsHash is the SHA-256 of the entire constants registry, serialised with sorted keys. Change any weight or threshold on this page and the hash changes with it. Each coin dataset carries the stamp the engine produced for it — engine version, inputsHash, constantsHash and the computation timestamp.
inputsHash is the SHA-256 of the exact research inputs, canonicalised the same way. The engine is pure: no clock, no randomness, no network. Identical inputs and identical constants therefore produce a byte-identical result, which is asserted by a determinism test and, for the STRICT score specifically, by a bit-exact parity test that recomputes every published coin dataset. That is what the two hashes buy you: a score is challengeable. If the hashes match and the number does not, we are wrong.
What this score does not do
The STRICT score measures published fundamentals. It is not a price forecast, and it is not financial advice. It says nothing about entry price, timing, market conditions, liquidity, custody, counterparty or regulatory risk — a high score on a token you buy at the top is still a loss.
The weights are registered as prior — hand-tuned judgement, not fitted to outcome data. They encode our view of what matters per sector, they carry a scheduled revisit date, and we make no claim that they are optimal. A different, defensible weighting would produce different scores.
The score is also bounded by what a project discloses: an opaque project is scored on fewer pillars, and pillar scores are analyst judgement over sourced data, not measurements.
The engine's forward-looking outputs — price bands, probabilities, cycle scenarios — are a separate system from the STRICT score, and every result it emits is stamped calibrationStatus: provisional. Predictions are written to an append-only ledger and re-scored against realised prices (direction hit rates, bear-breach frequency against implied probability, Brier score, 80% interval coverage), but no calibration results are published yet. Until they are, treat those numbers as uncalibrated.
Tingkat Skor
Skor STRICT berkisar dari 0-100, dikelompokkan dalam lima tingkat kualitas.
- 90-100Legendaris
- 80-89Emas
- 70-79Perak
- 60-69Perunggu
- 0-59Standar
Contoh Nyata
Lihat bagaimana Skor STRICT diterapkan pada cryptocurrency nyata di berbagai tingkat kualitas.
Pertanyaan yang Sering Diajukan
Seberapa sering Skor STRICT diperbarui?
Harga diperbarui secara langsung. Analisis setiap koin dijalankan ulang sesuai jadwal bergilir, dan setiap halaman koin menampilkan tanggal terakhir analisisnya dijalankan.
Apakah Skor STRICT tinggi menjamin keuntungan?
Tidak. Skor STRICT mengukur kualitas proyek dan fundamental, bukan pergerakan harga jangka pendek. Skor tinggi menunjukkan fundamental yang kuat, tetapi semua cryptocurrency membawa risiko. Kondisi pasar, waktu, dan faktor ekonomi yang lebih luas secara signifikan memengaruhi keuntungan terlepas dari skor.
Mengapa beberapa kripto memiliki skor Pendapatan nol?
Cryptocurrency penyimpan nilai seperti Bitcoin tidak menghasilkan biaya protokol atau pendapatan, sehingga pilar Pendapatan ditandai sebagai nol dan dikecualikan dari perhitungan skor keseluruhan. Ini mencegah penalti yang tidak adil terhadap aset yang fungsi utamanya bukan menghasilkan biaya.
Bagaimana STRICT dibandingkan dengan sistem penilaian lain?
Berbeda dengan metrik sederhana seperti peringkat kapitalisasi pasar atau penilaian berbasis sentimen, STRICT menyediakan analisis komprehensif dan multidimensi. Kami menggabungkan data kuantitatif dengan penilaian kualitatif di enam pilar berbeda, memberi Anda gambaran lengkap tentang fundamental proyek.
Bisakah saya menggunakan Skor STRICT untuk day trading?
Skor STRICT dirancang untuk analisis fundamental dan keputusan investasi jangka menengah hingga panjang, bukan untuk trading jangka pendek. Untuk day trading, analisis teknis, indikator momentum, dan sentimen pasar lebih relevan. Gunakan STRICT untuk mengidentifikasi proyek berkualitas, lalu terapkan strategi trading pilihan Anda.
Lihat STRICT Beraksi
Jelajahi peringkat crypto komprehensif kami yang didukung oleh metodologi STRICT